flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

If ‘only the paranoid survive,’ what does it take to thrive?

AEC Tech

If ‘only the paranoid survive,’ what does it take to thrive?


David Barista | June 27, 2016

Intel Co-founders (l. to r.): Andrew Grove, Robert Noyce, and Gordon Moore. Photo: Wikimedia Commons   

“Sooner or later, something fundamental in your business world will change.” The late Andrew Grove (1936-2016), Co-founder of tech giant Intel Corp., lived by these words. Grove, of course, would have known better than just about anyone, having thrived for decades in the cutthroat world of tech in Silicon Valley.

Grove, who along with Gordon Moore (of Moore’s Law fame) and Robert Noyce (nicknamed “The Mayor of Silicon Valley” for his business prowess) co-founded Intel in 1968, believed strongly in the value of paranoia. He was constantly on the lookout for what he called “strategic inflection points”—those moments of elemental change in a business environment that, if ignored, could mark the beginning of a downward spiral for a company or organization. It could be a technological advancement, a new competitor, a trade agreement, a tariff—anything that could lead to full-scale changes in the way business is conducted.

AEC firms, and their clients, are scrambling to keep up in this era of rapid technological and business change. They’re in a race to innovate.

In his seminal 1996 business leadership book, Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company and Career, Grove called these fundamental changes “deadly when unattended to,” and believed that companies could never fully recover from a downward slide. Hence his paranoia.

But Grove also acknowledged the incredible opportunities offered to the players who were adept at navigating a changing business ecosystem. As an example, he pointed to the flood of low-cost memory chip products from Japan in the 1980s. This inflection point was so overwhelming for Intel, it forced the company—which, at that time, was nearly a billion-dollar enterprise—completely out of the memory production business and into the fledging field of microprocessors. Can you imagine walking away from an established market worth hundreds of millions of dollars in favor of the unknown?

In many respects, Grove’s state of paranoia has permeated the AEC market, and for good reason. Technological advancements—BIM/VDC, computational design, virtual reality, reality capture—are changing the way firms perform work. Startups like Airbnb and WeWork are turning their clients’ business models upside down. Economic and policy shifts are placing intense pressure on major real estate sectors, including healthcare (Affordable Care Act) and higher education (student loan crisis). And the lagging affects of the Great Recession continue to place budget stresses on building segments.

AEC firms, and their clients, are scrambling to keep up in this era of rapid technological and business change. They’re in a race to innovate.

This state of mind was evident during an AEC technology panel discussion I participated in a few months ago. One of the panelists, a digital design leader at a major architecture giant, wowed the audience with a laundry list of jaw-dropping tech innovations the firm was either using regularly, piloting, or researching—game engines, beacons, computational design, drones mounted with 3D laser scanners, to name a few.

What struck me most was what he said next. He admitted that almost on a daily basis he has deep anxiety about his firm not doing enough to stay ahead. It is something that keeps him—and his colleagues—up at night. I thought to myself, Wow, if this guy feels this way, I can’t imagine what the tech laggards are feeling?

To thrive in today’s turbulent market, AEC professionals must think and act like those early Silicon Valley pioneers: maintain a level of paranoia and be ready and willing to pivot on a dime when a strategic inflection point hits.

More from Author

David Barista | Aug 15, 2019

3 ‘Giant’ AEC market trends for 2019-2020

We’re starting to see a shift toward custom research, thanks in part to the influx of data, data tools, and analytics expertise in the AEC market.

David Barista | Jul 31, 2019

Amenities war no more? Research report explores multifamily market

Multifamily developers show no signs of pulling back on specialty spaces and unique offerings in an effort to attract high-quality tenants, according to new research from Multifamily Design+Construction.

David Barista | Dec 30, 2016

An open letter to the AEC C-suite

Women AEC professionals need you to take action. 

David Barista | Sep 6, 2016

Innovation intervention: How AEC firms are driving growth through R&D programs

AEC firms are taking a page from the tech industry, by infusing a deep commitment to innovation and disruption into their cultural DNA.

David Barista | May 31, 2016

As commercial buildings get ‘smarter,’ concerns rise over cybercrime

As buildings become increasingly connected, opportunistic hackers have countless avenues into a building’s network. 

David Barista | May 9, 2016

Is the nation’s grand tech boom really an innovation funk?

Despite popular belief, the country is not in a great age of technological and digital innovation, at least when compared to the last great innovation era (1870-1970).

David Barista | Mar 31, 2016

Deep Learning + AI: How machines are becoming master problem solvers

Besides revolutionary changes to the world’s workforce, artificial intelligence could have a profound impact on the built environment and the AEC industry.

David Barista | Feb 24, 2016

Is the booming freelance economy a threat to AEC firms?

By shifting the work (and revenue) to freelancers, “platform capitalism” startups have taken considerable market share from traditional businesses.

David Barista | Jan 26, 2016

How the Fourth Industrial Revolution will alter the globe’s workforce

The next great technological metamorphosis will be unlike anything humankind has experienced before, due to the sheer size, speed, and scope of disruption.

David Barista | Jan 5, 2016

Potential vs. credential: How men and women differ in career progress

Recent research suggests that women face yet another career impediment: the confidence gap.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




Reconsidering construction robotics

After decades when experts predicted that robots would become more prevalent on construction sites, it would appear that the industry has finally reached that point where necessity, aspiration, and investment are colliding. 

halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021